State Lath of Didactics President Michael Kirst and State Superintendent Tom Torlakson expressed support Friday for ix districts' awarding for a waiver from the No Child Left Behind law. In letter to the U.S. Section of Education, they also raised questions near how the waiver would be implemented and enforced.

While stating that they would have preferred that Congress revise NCLB (or the Unproblematic and Secondary Education Act, as it'southward formally known), which they called a failure, Kirst and Torlakson wrote that "absent such activeness past Congress we are supportive of any try that will grant California'southward local instruction agencies the relief they need."

The CORE waiver proposal is based on three principles: 1) College- and career-ready expectations for all students, 2) State developed differentiated recognition, accountability and support, and 3) Supporting effective instruction and leadership. Source: CORE PowerPoint (Click to enlarge).

The CORE waiver proposal is based on three principles: 1) Higher- and career-gear up expectations for all students, 2) State developed differentiated recognition, accountability and support, and 3) Supporting effective education and leadership. Source: CORE PowerPoint (Click to enlarge).

The districts, serving more than 1 one thousand thousand students, have formed a nonprofit arrangement, the California Function to Reform Education, or CORE. They submitted a unique asking for a multi-district waiver, considering the federal government last year rejected California'south application for a state waiver. A waiver would give the districts flexibility to use more than than $100 million of federal Title I coin for low-income children and to propose creative ways to ameliorate their lowest performing schools. It would likewise free them from other NCLB penalties, such equally notifying parents that their schools are failures. The 9 unified districts are Los Angeles, Fresno, Long Beach, San Francisco, Clovis, Sanger, Sacramento Metropolis, Oakland and Santa Ana.

Torlakson and the State Board take no power to rule on a district waiver just they tin can suggest the federal Department of Education, which will decide whether to grant it. At their meeting last week, members of the Land Lath authorized Kirst and Torlakson to summarize their discussion of the plan. In their letter, Kirst and Torlakson noted, "Lath members expressed enthusiasm for the CORE districts' efforts to design an innovative waiver based on agreements they hope to make at the local level."

Other than that one line, the letter didn't convey why the bulk of the board said they favored a district waiver during their i-60 minutes discussion (encounter EdSource Today coverage of the meeting). The bulk of the letter focused on three areas of uncertainty that Kirst and Torlakson had raised at the coming together. They questioned:

  • How the land Department of Teaching would carry out dual NCLB monitoring systems, one for districts that have a waiver and one for those nevertheless under NCLB's provisions, and how a district waiver would mesh with country laws.
  • How districts other than the ix applying would go about obtaining a waiver and whether they could create their own version. Core has said the waiver procedure would be open up statewide to all districts and charter schools that concur to the federal requirements and CORE'due south conditions.
  • What criteria federal officials planned to use in approving the CORE districts' waiver.

In an interview Friday, Kirst said that the alphabetic character "was meant to be helpful" to the Cadre application. It "was non a critique of the substance of the proposal but instead raised questions that the land would face if the waiver was approved."

Noting that the Cadre superintendents also expressed their preference for a state waiver, Kirst and Torlakson wrote they would go along to "explore options" for one with federal officials. Then far, 45 states either have received a waiver or have applied for one. The concluding borderline for applying was in February. Kirst said he had not given up promise that the state could however obtain a land waiver to take event this fall, although he acknowledged that U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has not indicated that he'd still be open to  granting one to California.

Kirst said that the state was non competing with the districts seeking a waiver. "We are non trying to impede it in whatsoever way," he said.

To get more reports similar this one, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-toll daily electronic mail on latest developments in teaching.